Win more grants.
GrantGraph shows you who won a grant before, who to partner with, and where to find extra funding — so you apply with a plan.
Free to start · Built on public data
Grants.gov · USASpending · IRS 990/EO BMF · state portals · outcome feedback — joined.
Not "what grants exist" but "what does it take to win this one."
Free to explore. The graph nobody else has, at a Pro price under everyone.
Two audiences, one graph
The same data that helps a nonprofit win a grant tells a vendor which of their customers can fund a purchase with it. We work both sides.
Grant-seekers
Nonprofits, cities, counties, agencies, and consultants. Find the grant, see who won it, who to partner with, and how to stack the money — then write a stronger application.
Find your grants →Vendors & channel partners
Your customers buy your products with grant money. Show them which grants fund your category and how to win — so the funding that closes your sale actually lands.
See how it works for vendors →One grant, the whole picture
The graph turns a single listing into a strategy: who already won it, what those winners had in common, who to team up with, and which funders stack on top.
The opportunity
Open and forecasted grants, normalized by cause and geography.
Who got it
Past recipients near you, with award sizes — from federal award records.
What it takes to win
The shared traits of recent winners, surfaced as plain-language intelligence.
Who to team with
Active local orgs that fit the coalition this grant rewards.
How to fund the rest
Funders that have backed similar work, to layer on top.
Funding moves through relationships. So we map them.
Most tools help you find a grant. GrantGraph finds your warm path to the funder — who in your network was already funded by someone who funds this grant.
You have a warm introduction path. Ask for the intro instead of cold-applying.
The graph is the asset. Everything else is an application of it.
Search, alerts, and AI writing are table stakes — every competitor has them. We match those and lead with the layer no one else can build.
Why people buy
Tier 1- Coalition / partner matching
- Funding stacking
- Recipient graph + Winning Pattern Analysis
- Warm-introduction engine
The differentiators. No competitor assembles these.
What closes the sale
Tier 2- AI trained on who wins
- Partner-outreach workflow
- Recurrence / forecasting
Strong features — powerful because of the graph, not because they're AI.
Expected, never headlined
Tier 3- Grant search & filters
- Alerts & saved searches
- Pipeline & calendar
- AI writing itself
Table stakes. We match them on cost; we don't sell on them.
Built only on what the data supports
Nothing here promises more than public data can deliver. Where a signal is inferred or predicted, the interface says so — on every data point. That honesty is a feature, not a footnote.
| Feature | Powered by | What it can honestly show | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grant directory & eligibility | Grants.gov (NOFO), state portals | Open/forecasted grants, eligibility, deadlines. | solid |
| Local winner map | USASpending | Past federal recipients, award amounts, geography. | solid |
| Winning Pattern — attributes | USASpending + 990 (EIN) | Org size, geography, program type, funding level. Observed, not causal. | solid |
| Winning Pattern — coalition structure | USASpending subawards | Prime→sub only. Non-funded MOU partners aren't visible — shown as inferred. | inferred |
| "Odds of winning" | — not in public data — | Application counts aren't public, so we show award counts/sizes — never a fake win-rate %. | honest by omission |
| Coalition partner matching | IRS EO BMF + 990 | Active orgs by cause × ZIP, with shared-funder overlap as "why it fits." | solid |
| Warm-introduction engine | 990 grantee records | Who in your network was funded by a funder of this grant — a warm path. | solid |
| Funding stack suggestions | 990 grantee overlap | Funders that co-funded similar work. Suggested, not guaranteed. | inferred |
| Recurrence forecast | Historical posting/award cadence | Likely reopen window with a confidence figure. | forecast |
| Vendor outreach lists | SAM.gov (PSC/NAICS) + FPDS | Vendors who sell what a grant funds. Email needs enrichment; name+address is public. | scoped |
| Coalition Success Probability | subaward + outcome data | Needs enough winning-coalition examples; ships once data supports it. | roadmap |